two very different RESPONSES to chemical weapons detected on UK soil

Home Secretary Amber Rudd went on record stating that the government respond to evidence not rumour in the case of the Russian's found unconscious. Like Zane's case, a toxic chemical weapon was detected, there have been two emergency cobra meetings and government scientists from Porton Down investigating the scene, yet why didn't the government do the right thing with little Zane? Why kick Zane's death into the long grass? 

Here is an example of how supporters are helping. Today we received a copy of a letter sent to Home Secretary Amber Rudd. 

Dear Ms Rudd 
In relation to the case of two Russians currently critically ill due to a toxic nerve gas agent, you have stated that the government “responds to evidence not rumour.” 
I would be extremely grateful if you, or a relevant colleague, could therefore please explain why, when there appears to be worryingly significant evidence that the the toxic nerve agent Hydrogen Cyanide was detected in the house of Zane and his parents at the time when young Zane died, (and his parents and neighbours were hospitalised with symptoms of nerve gas poisoning, his father suffering disabling, irreversible nerve damage), this “evidence”, by contrast, is not being investigated in the public interest, in favour of a ‘speculative theory’ regarding the presence of carbon monoxide at the time, for which no evidence seems to exist? 
I very much look forward to hearing from you. 
Yours sincerely 
Barbara Pritchard

We await a response. We await a truthful investigation and we await the Truth About Zane. Little Zane deserves nothing less. 

Without help like Barbara's we fight alone. Please let us know if you can do anything to help push forward truth and justice for Zane.